Stievelman v. Donnenfeld Coal Co.
This text of 248 A.D. 469 (Stievelman v. Donnenfeld Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. A motion for a new trial on exceptions could not be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division after it had been heard and denied by the trial court. (Babad v. Colton Dental Association, 150 App. Div. 561; Starbuck v. Smith, 173 id. 954; Oglesby v. Massachusetts Accident Co., 212 id. 886.)
Present—■ Martin, P. J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 469, 290 N.Y.S. 725, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stievelman-v-donnenfeld-coal-co-nyappdiv-1936.