Stiers v. McCool

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma·Decided June 23, 2025·No. 5:24-cv-00868·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

COLLIN ANDREW PATRICK ) STIERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-24-868-R ) SAUNDA JEAN MCCOOL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ORDER

This matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Chris M. Stephens pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). Judge Stephens recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed upon screening. The case file shows no timely objection to the Report nor request for an extension of time, even though Plaintiff was expressly informed of his right to object, the procedure for doing so, and the consequences of failing to object. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff has waived further review of all issues addressed in the Report. See Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991); United States v. 2121 East 30th Street, 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] in its entirety and, for the reasons stated therein, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED this 23" day of June, 2025.

DAVID L. RUSSELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stiers v. McCool, (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Stiers v. McCool (Stiers v. McCool) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dennis Wayne Moore v. United States
950 F.2d 656 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. 2121 East 30th Street
73 F.3d 1057 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)