Stieber v. Wensel

19 Mo. 513
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 19 Mo. 513 (Stieber v. Wensel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stieber v. Wensel, 19 Mo. 513 (Mo. 1854).

Opinion

Gamble, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The tenth section of the seventh article of the code of practice provides : “ That, in an action for libel or slander, it [514]*514shall not be necessary to state in the petition any extrinsic facts,, for the purpose of showing the application to the plaintiff of the defamatory matter out, of which the cause of action arose but it shall be sufficient to state generally that the same was published or spoken concerning the plaintiff.” The form of such petition, given in the code, corresponds with this provision. The petition, in the present case, is good under the code, as it alleges that the words were spoken of the plaintiff, Mrs. Stieber.

2. The words themselves involve a charge of adultery, and, under the act of the general assembly, (R. C. 1011,) are actionable, without alleging special damage. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Batten v. Cox
233 P. 1040 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1925)
Connell v. A. C. L. Haase & Sons Fish Co.
257 S.W. 760 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1923)
Haynes v. Robertson
175 S.W. 290 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1915)
Fensky v. Maryland Casualty Co.
174 S.W. 416 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)
Tilles v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.
145 S.W. 1143 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1912)
Vanloon v. Vanloon
140 S.W. 631 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cook v. Globe Printing Co.
127 S.W. 332 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Brown v. Wintsch
84 S.W. 196 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Kersting v. White
80 S.W. 730 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1904)
Butts v. Long
68 S.W. 754 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Davis v. Sladden
17 Or. 259 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1889)
Roe v. Chitwood
36 Ark. 210 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1880)
Barber v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.
3 Mo. App. 377 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1877)
Atwinger v. Fellner
46 Mo. 276 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)
Curry v. Collins
37 Mo. 324 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1866)
Kinyon v. Palmer
18 Iowa 377 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Mo. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stieber-v-wensel-mo-1854.