Stiebel v. Haigney
134 A.D. 522, 119 N.Y.S. 460, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2905
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stiebel v. Haigney. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 A.D. 516 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1909·No. No. 2·Published
Opinion
This case was tried at the same time as Stiebel v. Haigney, No. 1 (134 App. Div. 516), the opinion in which is handed down herewith, and for the reasons there stated this judgment should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Ingraham, Laughlix, Houghton and Scott, JJ., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stiebel v. Haigney, 134 A.D. 522, 119 N.Y.S. 460, 1909 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
134 A.D. 522 (Stiebel v. Haigney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stiebel v. Haigney
134 A.D. 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)