Stidhum v. State
This text of 561 So. 2d 473 (Stidhum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state concedes that the appellant, while a minor, was illegally sentenced contrary to the provisions of Section 39.-111(7)(d), Florida Statutes (1983), and State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); Dixon v. State, 451 So.2d 485 (Fla. 3d DCA (1984). Therefore, the concurrent life sen-fences imposed on the appellant be and the same are hereby vacated and the matter is returned to the trial court for appropriate sentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
561 So. 2d 473, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3799, 1990 WL 70516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stidhum-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.