Stidham v. State
This text of 579 So. 2d 319 (Stidham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant, Edward Ray Stidham, was charged and convicted of conspiracy to traffic in cocaine pursuant to section 893.-135, Florida Statutes (1989) and of transporting funds with the intent to purchase cocaine. § 896.101(2)(b)l, Fla.Stat. (1989).
Stidham was sentenced to five years in the Department of Corrections with an additional fine of $50,000.00 under the conspiracy count. Under “Special Provisions,” the court imposed the five-year minimum provisions of section 893.135(1).1 As to transporting funds, the defendant was sentenced to five years to be served concurrently with the conspiracy count.
After careful consideration of the record and the arguments presented, we affirm the judgment but are cognizant of the fact that the written judgment filed in open court on June 8, 1990, should also list section 893.135(5).2 Without the additional statute listed, the judgment appears to be for trafficking in cocaine not conspiracy to traffic in cocaine. Additionally, this court takes note of the clerical error contained within the written sentence wherein the trial court sentenced the defendant to a five-year mandatory minimum term instead of the correct mandatory minimum term of three years which the judgment mandates. § 893.135(l)(b)l., Fla.Stat. (1989). Accordingly, we remand so that the trial court [320]*320may correct and amend the judgment and sentence.
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
579 So. 2d 319, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4163, 1991 WL 72086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stidham-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.