Stickney v. United States

Court of Claims

Stickney v. United States

73 Ct. Cl. 697, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 505, 1932 WL 2197

United States Court of Claims·Decided February 8, 1932·No. No. M-57·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[699]*699MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This action is in all respects similar to the case of Rodman v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 751, in which this court held that a retired naval officer of the grade of rear admiral at the time of retirement when recalled to active duty is entitled to active duty pay, as provided by the act of August 29, 1916, 39 Stat. 581.

This plaintiff, as in the case cited, was recalled to active duty and served from May 5, 1925, to March 12, 1926, when he reverted to his retired status, and is therefore entitled to the difference between retired pay and the active duty pay-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[699]*699MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

This action is in all respects similar to the case of Rodman v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 751, in which this court held that a retired naval officer of the grade of rear admiral at the time of retirement when recalled to active duty is entitled to active duty pay, as provided by the act of August 29, 1916, 39 Stat. 581.

This plaintiff, as in the case cited, was recalled to active duty and served from May 5, 1925, to March 12, 1926, when he reverted to his retired status, and is therefore entitled to the difference between retired pay and the active duty pay-

Stickney v. United States, 73 Ct. Cl. 697, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 505, 1932 WL 2197 (cc 1932).

Pincite

73 Ct. Cl. 697 (Stickney v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related