Stickney v. United States
This text of 73 Ct. Cl. 697 (Stickney v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[699]*699MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT
This action is in all respects similar to the case of Rodman v. United States, 70 C. Cls. 751, in which this court held that a retired naval officer of the grade of rear admiral at the time of retirement when recalled to active duty is entitled to active duty pay, as provided by the act of August 29, 1916, 39 Stat. 581.
This plaintiff, as in the case cited, was recalled to active duty and served from May 5, 1925, to March 12, 1926, when he reverted to his retired status, and is therefore entitled to the difference between retired pay and the active duty pay-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Ct. Cl. 697, 1932 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 505, 1932 WL 2197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stickney-v-united-states-cc-1932.