Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.
717 A.2d 236, 245 Conn. 919, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 609 (AC 17181), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the workers’ compensation commissioner had no jurisdiction to consider the motion to open a voluntary agreement filed by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc., 717 A.2d 236, 245 Conn. 919, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 279 (Colo. 1998).
717 A.2d 236 (Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.
730 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)