Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.

717 A.2d 236, 245 Conn. 919, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 279

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 2, 1998

DocketSC 15968

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 717 A.2d 236 (Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stickney v. Sunlight Construction, Inc., 717 A.2d 236, 245 Conn. 919, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 279 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 609 (AC 17181), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the workers’ compensation commissioner had no jurisdiction to consider the motion to open a voluntary agreement filed by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 609 (AC 17181), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the workers’ compensation commissioner had no jurisdiction to consider the motion to open a voluntary agreement filed by Aetna Casualty and Surety Company?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

717 A.2d 236, 245 Conn. 919, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stickney-v-sunlight-construction-inc-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack