Stickney v. Bell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Stickney v. Bell

128 N.W. 865, 144 Wis. 176, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 350

DecidedDecember 6, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 128 N.W. 865 (Stickney v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stickney v. Bell, 128 N.W. 865, 144 Wis. 176, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 350 (Wis. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

EaeNes, J.

An examination of the record convinces us that there was ample evidence in the case to support the finding of the jury to the effect that the survey made by the surveyor employed by the defendant established the true boundary line of the strip of land in controversy. This being so, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. It would serve no useful purpose to recite such evidence.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EaeNes, J.

An examination of the record convinces us that there was ample evidence in the case to support the finding of the jury to the effect that the survey made by the surveyor employed by the defendant established the true boundary line of the strip of land in controversy. This being so, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. It would serve no useful purpose to recite such evidence.

By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 N.W. 865, 144 Wis. 176, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stickney-v-bell-wis-1910.