Stickney, Treas. v. Isaac

157 N.E. 431, 24 Ohio App. 527, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 516, 1926 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 883, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 451
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 1, 1926
Docket182
StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.E. 431 (Stickney, Treas. v. Isaac) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stickney, Treas. v. Isaac, 157 N.E. 431, 24 Ohio App. 527, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 516, 1926 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 883, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 451 (Ohio Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

This case came to the Court of Appeals on appeal from the Williams Common Pleas. In a former litigation, George Isaac brought suit to enjoin the collection of a liquor traffic assessment by the auditor against lots 260, 261 and 262, in the City of Bryan. Collection was enjoined as against lots 260 and 261 but the assessment upon lot 262 was held to be a valid lien.

Ross Stickney in this case sought to enforce this lien and one Henry Rosen claimed a lien on the premises by virtue of three mortgages. The Court of Appeals held:

1. For years it was the settled law that upon a judicial sale of real property which is encumbered by the lien of a liquor tax assessment and the liens of mortgages, the former is entitled to priority over the latter in the distribution of the proceeds of the sale. 90 OS. 355.
2. Section 6212-33 GC. as amended on April 5, 1923, 110 OL. 75 provides that where a mortgage exists on such real property, for a valuable consideration, in good faith without knowledge on part of the mortgagee that such property was being used for the illegal traffic in intoxicating liquors, the lien shall be prior to the lien of assessment.
3. It is claimed that the assessment lien attached prior to the amendment, so that it is necessary to determine whether it is applicable to an assessment previously made.
4. Sec. 26 GC., provides that no repeal or amendment shall effect causes of such action .... existing at the time of such amendment or repeal, unless otherwise expressly provided in the amending or repealing act.
5. As there is no language in the amending act which provides it shall apply to existing causes of action, its enactment did not change the order of priority as between the assessment lien and the mortgage liens.
6. The language employed in 6212-33 GC. is made applicable in cases where a mortgage existed at the time the assessment' is made and not to one which existed at the time the section was amended.
7. The tax lien must be satisfied first out of the ^proceeds of the sale of lot 262 and any fund remaining may be applied in satisfaction of the mortgage liens.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.E. 431, 24 Ohio App. 527, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 516, 1926 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 883, 1926 Ohio App. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stickney-treas-v-isaac-ohioctapp-1926.