Stice v. State
829 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2002 WL 31525630
Opinion
Michael Ray Stice appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.800(a) motion. In accordance with Pantle v. State, 784 So.2d 1139 [1006] (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), Stice is entitled to be resentenced under the 1994 guidelines. We certify conflict with Vause v. State, 803 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stice v. State, 829 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2002 WL 31525630 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
829 So. 2d 1005 (Stice v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pantle v. State
784 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Vause v. State
803 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)