Stice v. State
829 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2002 WL 31525630
This text of 829 So. 2d 1005 (Stice v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stice v. State, 829 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2002 WL 31525630 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Michael Ray Stice appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure Rule 3.800(a) motion. In accordance with Pantle v. State, 784 So.2d 1139 [1006]*1006(Fla. 2d DCA 2001), Stice is entitled to be resentenced under the 1994 guidelines. We certify conflict with Vause v. State, 803 So.2d 799 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).
Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pantle v. State
784 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Vause v. State
803 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
829 So. 2d 1005, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16960, 2002 WL 31525630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stice-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.