Sthreshley v. Fisher
This text of 3 Ky. 249 (Sthreshley v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the of ' court: — If both the defendants were liable, the coned, as well as the original imprisonment, with all the equences of it, was proper evidence to go to the ju-md this leads to the inquiry, as to the liability of dridge, the magistrate ; of which, a majority of irt have no doubt ; as a commitment to jail, to tnec. ^ ⅛" a called court, upon a charge of intention to be tn felony, is wholly illegal, unprecedented, and £°|¾⅞> ''' ^ ’ as weH bY the spirit of our constitution, as Pr which provide individual redress for all unjust , Vg. s of personal liberty and security. yicnajouj. tbv , tint com rv; ■ Vicol the cot
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sthreshley-v-fisher-kyctapp-1808.