Stewart's Administratrix v. Callaghan

23 F. Cas. 54, 4 D.C. 594, 4 Cranch 594

This text of 23 F. Cas. 54 (Stewart's Administratrix v. Callaghan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart's Administratrix v. Callaghan, 23 F. Cas. 54, 4 D.C. 594, 4 Cranch 594 (circtddc 1835).

Opinion

But the Court

(nem. con.) was of opinion, that as the commissions of the supercargo would have been a charge upon the proceeds of the sales of the cargo, if it had arrived at the place of its destination, they are to be considered as a charge upon the fund, which stands in the place of .those proceeds of sales, and were not a proper charge against the king of the Two Sicilies, under the treaty of indemnity, and that the plaintiff is entitled to the same, under the agreement, both at law and in equity.

The injunction was ordered to stand until final hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F. Cas. 54, 4 D.C. 594, 4 Cranch 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewarts-administratrix-v-callaghan-circtddc-1835.