Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth

122 A.3d 1033, 632 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2063
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 16, 2015
Docket87 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.3d 1033 (Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth, 122 A.3d 1033, 632 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2063 (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, Petition for Writ of *647 Habeas Corpus, and Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED, See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (holding that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Ellis
626 A.2d 1137 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 A.3d 1033, 632 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewartiii-e-v-commonwealth-pa-2015.