Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth

122 A.3d 1033, 632 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2063

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 16, 2015·No. 87 EM 2015·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, Petition for Writ of *647 Habeas Corpus, and Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED, See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (holding that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, Petition for Writ of *647 Habeas Corpus, and Application for an Immediate Hearing are DISMISSED, See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 534 Pa. 176, 626 A.2d 1137 (1993) (holding that hybrid representation is impermissible). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.

Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth, 122 A.3d 1033, 632 Pa. 646, 2015 Pa. LEXIS 2063 (Pa. 2015).

Pincite

122 A.3d 1033 (Stewart,III, E. v. Commonwealth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related