Stewart William Baylor, Jr. v. E. C. Morris Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman David L. Smith Richard A. Young

Fourth Circuit

Stewart William Baylor, Jr. v. E. C. Morris Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman David L. Smith Richard A. Young

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10998, 1995 WL 91299

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 1995

Docket94-6981

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1215 (Stewart William Baylor, Jr. v. E. C. Morris Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman David L. Smith Richard A. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart William Baylor, Jr. v. E. C. Morris Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman David L. Smith Richard A. Young, 48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10998, 1995 WL 91299 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stewart William BAYLOR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E. C. MORRIS; Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman;
David L. Smith; Richard A. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6981.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 7, 1995.

Steward William Baylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baylor v. Morris, No. CA-93-550-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 14, 1994; July 12, 1994; and Aug. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1215
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Stewart William BAYLOR, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
E. C. MORRIS; Valerie D. Rasheed, Regional Ombudsman;
David L. Smith; Richard A. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6981.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 7, 1995.

Steward William Baylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Baylor v. Morris, No. CA-93-550-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 14, 1994; July 12, 1994; and Aug. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1215, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10998, 1995 WL 91299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-william-baylor-jr-v-e-c-morris-valerie-d-r-ca4-1995.