Stewart v. Zirilli

209 A.D.2d 1053, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12176

This text of 209 A.D.2d 1053 (Stewart v. Zirilli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Zirilli, 209 A.D.2d 1053, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12176 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Mohawk Containers, Inc., now known as Jefferson Smurfit, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The issue of duty is one of law for the courts (De Angelis v Lutheran Med. Ctr., 58 NY2d 1053, 1055). Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the movant owed no duty to the child (see, Pulka v Edelman, 40 NY2d 781; see also, Matthews v Scotia-Glenville School Sys., 94 AD2d 912, lv denied 60 NY2d 559; cf., Gayden v City of Rochester, 148 AD2d 975). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present —Green, J. P., Pine, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pulka v. Edelman
358 N.E.2d 1019 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
De Angelis v. Lutheran Medical Center
449 N.E.2d 406 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
Matthews v. Scotia-Glenville School System
94 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Gayden v. City of Rochester
148 A.D.2d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 1053, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1009, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-zirilli-nyappdiv-1994.