Stewart v. Wolfe
7 A. 165, 4 Sadler 314
Opinion
The law of this case was well stated by the court below when it said that the replevin bond given by Riddle was a substitute for the property delivered to him upon it, and that the purchaser from him acquired a good title to the property sued for in this action.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. Wolfe, 7 A. 165, 4 Sadler 314 (Pa. 1886).
7 A. 165 (Stewart v. Wolfe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCord v. Akeley
111 N.W. 1100 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Katz v. Hlavac
92 N.W. 506 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1902)
Foerderer v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of New York
107 F. 219 (Second Circuit, 1901)
Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.
73 N.W. 527 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)