Stewart v. Wolfe
7 A. 165, 4 Sadler 314
This text of 7 A. 165 (Stewart v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Stewart v. Wolfe, 7 A. 165, 4 Sadler 314 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
The law of this case was well stated by the court below when it said that the replevin bond given by Riddle was a substitute for the property delivered to him upon it, and that the purchaser from him acquired a good title to the property sued for in this action.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McCord v. Akeley
111 N.W. 1100 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Katz v. Hlavac
92 N.W. 506 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1902)
Foerderer v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of New York
107 F. 219 (Second Circuit, 1901)
Union National Bank v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.
73 N.W. 527 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 A. 165, 4 Sadler 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-wolfe-pa-1886.