Stewart v. Wilson

8 Ky. 255, 1 A.K. Marsh. 255, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 88
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJune 15, 1818
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Ky. 255 (Stewart v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Wilson, 8 Ky. 255, 1 A.K. Marsh. 255, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 88 (Ky. Ct. App. 1818).

Opinion

Judge Owsley

delivered the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion the verdict of the jury rendered in this case, cannot be supported by the evidence set forth in the bill of exceptions.

To have authorised the jury to find for Wilson, as he was plaintiff in the warrant, evidence of his being ed in fact of the land upon which the forcible entry is al-¡edged to have been committed by Stewart, should most indisputable have been produced.

But^upon adverting;to the evidence, we are of opinion that Wilson is not shewn to have been so possessed, and [256]*256consequently the court below ought, at the instance of Stewart, to have awarded a new trial. The judgment must, therefore, be reversed with cost, the cause remanded, and further proceedings had not inconsistent with this opinion.

Bibb for appellant, Pope for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JENKINS v. TYNON.
27 P. 893 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Ky. 255, 1 A.K. Marsh. 255, 1818 Ky. LEXIS 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-wilson-kyctapp-1818.