Stewart v. Virginia

Supreme Court

Stewart v. Virginia

117 U.S. 612, 6 S. Ct. 922, 29 L. Ed. 1006, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1880

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedApril 12, 1886

Docket1263

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 117 U.S. 612 (Stewart v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Virginia, 117 U.S. 612, 6 S. Ct. 922, 29 L. Ed. 1006, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1880 (1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justioe Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this case is affirmed. A proceeding under the act of Assembly of Virginia,,approved January 14, 1882, Anioni v. Greenhow, 107 U. S. 771, as amended by the act Of March 12, 1884, for the “ identification and verification” of coupons tendered in payment of taxes, debts, or demands due the State, is not a suit of a civil nature ai’ising under the Constitution or laws of the United- States within' the meaning of the act of March 3, 1875,18 „Stat. 470, ch. 137. The only purpose of such a proceeding is to determine whether the coupons tendered “ are genuine, legal coupons, which are legally receivable for taxes, dues and demands.” The court has nothing to do in that proceeding with the obligation of the State to receive the coupons in payment of the particular tax or demand for which they were tendered. The tender being made, it becomes the duty of the collector, under the law, 'to receive and receipt' for the coupons.“ for the purpose of identification and verification,” and to deliver them to the judge of the •proper court to that end. . The tax-payer then files his petition praying “ that a jury be impaneled to try the question as to whether they are genuine, legal coupons, which are legally receivable for taxes, debts and demands.” This is the only issue that can be tried, and if finally decided in favor of the taxpayer, the coupons are to be received by the collector.for such of the taxes, dues and demands for which they were tendered as can; under the contract of the State, be paid in that way. *615 The court has no authority under the law to determine in that proceeding what taxes- may be so paid. It thus appears that the issue to be tried cannot involve any question arising under the Constitution or laws' of the IJnitéd States.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justioe Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The order remanding this case is affirmed. A proceeding under the act of Assembly of Virginia,,approved January 14, 1882, Anioni v. Greenhow, 107 U. S. 771, as amended by the act Of March 12, 1884, for the “ identification and verification” of coupons tendered in payment of taxes, debts, or demands due the State, is not a suit of a civil nature ai’ising under the Constitution or laws of the United- States within' the meaning of the act of March 3, 1875,18 „Stat. 470, ch. 137. The only purpose of such a proceeding is to determine whether the coupons tendered “ are genuine, legal coupons, which are legally receivable for taxes, dues and demands.” The court has nothing to do in that proceeding with the obligation of the State to receive the coupons in payment of the particular tax or demand for which they were tendered. The tender being made, it becomes the duty of the collector, under the law, 'to receive and receipt' for the coupons.“ for the purpose of identification and verification,” and to deliver them to the judge of the •proper court to that end. . The tax-payer then files his petition praying “ that a jury be impaneled to try the question as to whether they are genuine, legal coupons, which are legally receivable for taxes, debts and demands.” This is the only issue that can be tried, and if finally decided in favor of the taxpayer, the coupons are to be received by the collector.for such of the taxes, dues and demands for which they were tendered as can; under the contract of the State, be paid in that way. *615 The court has no authority under the law to determine in that proceeding what taxes- may be so paid. It thus appears that the issue to be tried cannot involve any question arising under the Constitution or laws' of the IJnitéd States.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 U.S. 612, 6 S. Ct. 922, 29 L. Ed. 1006, 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-virginia-scotus-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack