Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C.

Fourth Circuit

Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C.

678 F. App'x 138

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 28, 2017·No. No. 17-1005·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C., No. 3:16-cv-00772-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ralph Stewart, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C., No. 3:16-cv-00772-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C., 678 F. App'x 138 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

678 F. App'x 138 (Stewart v. Verbena Askew Law Firm, P.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.