Stewart v. Stewart

57 N.J. Eq. 664
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 N.J. Eq. 664 (Stewart v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Stewart, 57 N.J. Eq. 664 (N.J. 1898).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree unanimously affirmed, for reasons given by the ordinary, with costs to the respondents.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In RE ESTATE OF DuBOIS
76 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 N.J. Eq. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-stewart-nj-1898.