Stewart v. Stewart

57 N.J. Eq. 664
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 15, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree unanimously affirmed, for reasons given by the ordinary, with costs to the respondents.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Ludlow, Collins, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenburgh — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Stewart, 57 N.J. Eq. 664 (N.J. 1898).

57 N.J. Eq. 664 (Stewart v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE ESTATE OF DuBOIS
76 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)