Stewart v. Stewart

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Stewart v. Stewart

486 So. 2d 179, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 6447

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 25, 1986·No. No. 84-1197·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KING, Judge.

This case was consolidated at trial with the case of John Makar v. Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart, Docket Number 84-1198. For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, 486 So.2d 166 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part, and rendered. The amended judgment is contained in the consolidated case.

All costs of this appeal are taxed equally against Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART; AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KING, Judge.

This case was consolidated at trial with the case of John Makar v. Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart, Docket Number 84-1198. For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, 486 So.2d 166 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part, and rendered. The amended judgment is contained in the consolidated case.

All costs of this appeal are taxed equally against Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART; AND RENDERED.

Stewart v. Stewart, 486 So. 2d 179, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 6447 (La. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

486 So. 2d 179 (Stewart v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related