Stewart v. Stewart

486 So. 2d 179, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 6447
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 25, 1986
DocketNo. 84-1197
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 486 So. 2d 179 (Stewart v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Stewart, 486 So. 2d 179, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 6447 (La. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

KING, Judge.

This case was consolidated at trial with the case of John Makar v. Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart, Docket Number 84-1198. For the reasons assigned in our disposition of that case, 486 So.2d 166 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part, reversed in part, amended in part, and rendered. The amended judgment is contained in the consolidated case.

All costs of this appeal are taxed equally against Wamul Ferguson Stewart and Tommy Gene Stewart.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AMENDED IN PART; AND RENDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Makar v. Stewart
486 So. 2d 166 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
486 So. 2d 179, 1986 La. App. LEXIS 6447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-stewart-lactapp-1986.