Stewart v. Stewart

5 Ky. Op. 319, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 393
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 5, 1871
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ky. Op. 319 (Stewart v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Stewart, 5 Ky. Op. 319, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 393 (Ky. Ct. App. 1871).

Opinion

•Opinion by

Judge Peters:

It was important that appellant should have proved by the subscribing witnesses if there were any, that Ralph Stewart executed the bond under which he asserts claim. Without some evidence of the execution of the bond, or of the signature of Ralph Stewart to the writing, appellant cannot successfully assert claim to the land against the heirs. The paper presented to Brown when the answer was drawn purported to be a bond for a title for the land, but Brown does not prove that the signature to it was Ralph Stewart’s, nor that he ever heard him acknowledge it nor that he knew the signature to it to be R. Stewart’s. We are not therefore prepared to say that the evidence was [320]*320sufficient to establish the execution, and. existence of the asserted bond.

Brown & Dawson, for appellants. L. T. Moore, for appellee.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Ky. Op. 319, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-stewart-kyctapp-1871.