Stewart v. Steenbock

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nebraska
DecidedFebruary 12, 2024
Docket8:24-cv-00044
StatusUnknown

This text of Stewart v. Steenbock (Stewart v. Steenbock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Steenbock, (D. Neb. 2024).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

DEON A. STEWART,

Plaintiff, 8:24CV44

vs. MEMROANDUM AND ORDER KELLY STEENBOCK,

Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on its own motion. Plaintiff filed a Complaint, Filing No. 1, on February 5, 2024. However, Plaintiff failed to include the $405.00 filing and administrative fees. Plaintiff has the choice of either submitting the $405.00 filing and administrative fees to the Clerk’s office or submitting a request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).1 Failure to take either action within 30 days will result in the Court dismissing this case without further notice to Plaintiff. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff is directed to submit the $405.00 fees to the Clerk’s office or submit a request to proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of this matter without further notice.

1 If Plaintiff is granted leave to proceed IFP in this matter, he will be allowed to pay the Court’s $350 filing fee in installments. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529–30 (8th Cir. 1997). He would not be subject to the $55.00 administrative fee assessed to non-IFP plaintiffs. Prisoner plaintiffs are required to pay the full amount of the Court’s $350.00 filing fee by making monthly payments to the Court, even if the prisoner is proceeding IFP. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to Plaintiff the Form AO240 (“Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit”). 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this matter with the following text: March 13, 2024: Check for MIFP or payment.

Dated this 12th day of February, 2024.

BY THE COURT: Gs ¥ Bolaill Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Melvin Leroy Tyler
110 F.3d 528 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Stewart v. Steenbock, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-steenbock-ned-2024.