Stewart v. State

2010 WY 16, 223 P.3d 1291, 2010 Wyo. LEXIS 17, 2010 WL 559045
Wyoming Supreme Court·Decided February 18, 2010·No. S-09-0198·Published

Opinion

OrpEr Arrirminc tHE JUDGMENT AND Sentence or tHe District Court

[T1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has failed to file a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. On November 830, 2009, appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a "Motion to Withdraw as Counsel," pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the "Anders briefs" submitted by counsel, this Court entered, on December 14, 2009, its "Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw." That Order provided that the District Court's July 2, 2009 "Judgment and Sentence" would be affirmed unless, on or before February 1, 2010, the appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous. Taking notice that the appellant, Alyssa Stewart, has failed to file a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court's "Judgment and Sentence" should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[T2] ORDERED that the District Court's July 2, 2009 "Judgment and Sentence" be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

BY THE COURT:

/s) Barton R. Voigt BARTON R. VOIGT Chief Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 2010 WY 16, 223 P.3d 1291, 2010 Wyo. LEXIS 17, 2010 WL 559045 (Wyo. 2010).

2010 WY 16 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)