Stewart v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Stewart v. State

204 N.W.2d 679, 57 Wis. 2d 763, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1604

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1973

DocketNo. State 36

StatusPublished

This text of 204 N.W.2d 679 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. State, 204 N.W.2d 679, 57 Wis. 2d 763, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1604 (Wis. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The single issue raised on this review of the denial of the defendant’s sec. 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief is whether he had effective representation of counsel at his trial. After reviewing the record and in accordance with the test for effective representation by counsel as established in Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 138, 126 N. W. 2d 625, the court concludes that defendant’s counsel competently and adequately represented him at his trial.-

The order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The single issue raised on this review of the denial of the defendant’s sec. 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief is whether he had effective representation of counsel at his trial. After reviewing the record and in accordance with the test for effective representation by counsel as established in Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 138, 126 N. W. 2d 625, the court concludes that defendant’s counsel competently and adequately represented him at his trial.-

The order is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 N.W.2d 679, 57 Wis. 2d 763, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-wis-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack