Stewart v. State
204 N.W.2d 679, 57 Wis. 2d 763, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1604
Opinion
The single issue raised on this review of the denial of the defendant’s sec. 974.06, Stats., motion for postconviction relief is whether he had effective representation of counsel at his trial. After reviewing the record and in accordance with the test for effective representation by counsel as established in Pulaski v. State (1964), 23 Wis. 2d 138, 126 N. W. 2d 625, the court concludes that defendant’s counsel competently and adequately represented him at his trial.-
The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. State, 204 N.W.2d 679, 57 Wis. 2d 763, 1973 Wisc. LEXIS 1604 (Wis. 1973).
204 N.W.2d 679 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pulaski v. State
126 N.W.2d 625 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1964)