Stewart v. State
This text of 209 S.W.3d 127 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and sentenced to thirty-five years imprisonment. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding the evidence factually insufficient to affirmatively link Appellant to the methamphetamine. Stewart v. State, 187 S.W.3d 249 (Tex.App.El Paso, 2006). The State petitioned this Court for discretionary review.
When the Court of Appeals issued its opinion in this case, it did so without the benefit of this Court’s recent opinion in Watson v. State, 204 S.W.3d 404 (Tex.CrimApp., 2006). Therefore, we vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand for that court to consider the ef- *128 feet of Watson, if any, on its reasoning and analysis in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 S.W.3d 127, 2006 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2385, 2006 WL 3626341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-texcrimapp-2006.