Stewart v. State

2 S.W.2d 440, 108 Tex. Crim. 661, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 92
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 11, 1928
DocketNo. 11322.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 2 S.W.2d 440 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 2 S.W.2d 440, 108 Tex. Crim. 661, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 92 (Tex. 1928).

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully establishing a lottery, punishment fixed at a fine of $150.

The trial took place at a term of the. County Court which adjourned on the 4th day of June, 1927. On September 3, 1927, there was filed in the County Court a statement of facts, and on September 1 several bills of exception were filed. Under the law the appellant was required to file the statement of facts and bills of exceptions within thirty days after the adjournment of court, unless before the expiration of that time the trial judge or court, for good cause shown, extended the time within which the statement of facts and bills of exception might be filed. See Art. 760, Subd. 5, C. C. P., 1925; Gribble v. State, 210 S. W. 215. The thirty days allowed by statute expired on the 4th day of July. On the 27th of that month the judge entered an order granting sixty additional days within which the statement of facts and bills of exceptions might be filed. Such order was unauthorized. To -be effective the order should have been made before the expiration of July 4. See Miller v. State, 267 S. W. 487; Mireles v. State, 266 S. W. 418. This court is not permitted to consider either the statement of facts or the bills of exceptions.

No fundamental error has been pointed out or discovered, and no ruling, of the court has been presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in Re Deepwater Horizon
470 S.W.3d 452 (Texas Supreme Court, 2015)
American Broadcasting Co. v. United States
110 F. Supp. 374 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Goodall v. United States
180 F.2d 397 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)
Lucas v. State
211 S.W.2d 222 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1948)
Cadrin v. State
89 S.W.2d 1001 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Boyd v. State
39 S.W.2d 55 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Logan v. State
27 S.W.2d 171 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Elbury v. State
25 S.W.2d 846 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Leago v. State
13 S.W.2d 852 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 S.W.2d 440, 108 Tex. Crim. 661, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-texcrimapp-1928.