Stewart v. State

162 S.W. 517, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 736
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 Tex. Crim. 480
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 23, 1913·Published

Opinion

PRENDERGAST, P. J.

Appellant appeals from a conviction for seduction with his penalty fixed at five years in the penitentiary. There is with the record what was perhaps intended for a statement of facts, but it is not approved by the trial judge. It has no approval whatever upon it. Of course, this court cannot consider it for any purpose. There are no questions raised which can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

DAVIDSON, X, absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 162 S.W. 517, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 736 (Tex. 1913).

162 S.W. 517 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.