Stewart v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Stewart v. State

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 625

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 1922·No. No. 16889·Published

Opinions

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, O. J., Johnson and Wanamaker, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of the case (one of the judges not participating) and are unable for that reason to agree upon a judgment, the entry of this fact constitutes an affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, O. J., Johnson and Wanamaker, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Stewart v. State, 105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 625 (Ohio 1922).

Pincite

105 Ohio St. (N.S.) 625 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related