Stewart v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Stewart v. State

879 S.W.2d 571, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 670, 1994 WL 133110

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 1994·No. No. 64546·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant pled guilty to selling a controlled substance and was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law [572]*572appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find a written opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant pled guilty to selling a controlled substance and was sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find the motion court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and no error of law [572]*572appears. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find a written opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Stewart v. State, 879 S.W.2d 571, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 670, 1994 WL 133110 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

879 S.W.2d 571 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.