Stewart v. State

131 S.E. 924, 35 Ga. App. 205, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 636
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Stewart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ga. App. 386
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1926·No. 17038·Published

Opinion

Beoyxes, O. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and none of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial (some of which were disapproved by the court) show cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 131 S.E. 924, 35 Ga. App. 205, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 636 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

131 S.E. 924 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.