Stewart v. State
63 S.E. 141, 5 Ga. App. 368, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 127
Opinion
No error of law is complained of. The only doubtful issue? of fact is, whether the taking of the hogs by the defendant was under-a bona fide claim of light, or animo furandi. This issue was clearly-submitted by the charge, and the verdict of the jury is sufficiently supported to prevent the interference of this court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. State, 63 S.E. 141, 5 Ga. App. 368, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 127 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
63 S.E. 141 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Subirá
27 P.R. 567 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1919)
Atlantic Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Mayor of Savannah
65 S.E. 184 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)