Stewart v. State

23 Ga. 181
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin J.,

delivering the opinion.

Does the Act of 1845, or any other statute upon this subject, granting certain privileges and immunities to the Columbus Guards and other volunteer corps in the City of Columbus, apply to, and include honorary members ?

We think not. The actual service rendered, and skill acquired by the regular members, is the foundation of the exemption from road, patrol, and jury duties. And however useful the money of the honorary members may be, in sustaining these corps, we cannot think they were intended to be embraced in the exemption. Neither the letter of the law, when carefully scrutinized, nor its spirit, would warrant any other conclusion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 23 Ga. 181 (Ga. 1857).

23 Ga. 181 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hay v. Superior Court
215 P. 717 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)