Stewart v. State

23 Ga. 181
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 Ga. 181 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. State, 23 Ga. 181 (Ga. 1857).

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin J.,

delivering the opinion.

Does the Act of 1845, or any other statute upon this subject, granting certain privileges and immunities to the Columbus Guards and other volunteer corps in the City of Columbus, apply to, and include honorary members ?

We think not. The actual service rendered, and skill acquired by the regular members, is the foundation of the exemption from road, patrol, and jury duties. And however useful the money of the honorary members may be, in sustaining these corps, we cannot think they were intended to be embraced in the exemption. Neither the letter of the law, when carefully scrutinized, nor its spirit, would warrant any other conclusion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hay v. Superior Court
215 P. 717 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Ga. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-ga-1857.