Stewart v. State

990 So. 2d 658, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13831, 2008 WL 4148989
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 2008·No. No. 4D08-2544·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Stewart petitions this court for a writ of certiorari seeking review of an order denying his rule 3.800(c) motion as untimely filed. The State agrees that the motion to mitigate sentence was timely filed within sixty days of this court’s mandate on direct appeal. Stewart v. State, 976 So.2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Accordingly, we grant the petition and remand this case for the circuit court to consider the rule 3.800(c) motion on the merits. See Vrobel v. State, 884 So.2d 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); McCalla v. State, 814 So.2d 1209, 1210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002).

FARMER, TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. State, 990 So. 2d 658, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 13831, 2008 WL 4148989 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

990 So. 2d 658 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCrory v. State
990 So. 2d 658 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)