Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Stewart v. State

290 So. 2d 83, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7970

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1974·No. No. U-25·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty by a jury on charges of possession of recently stolen property.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that reversible error was committed in the proceedings below, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. '

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J.. and WIGGINTON, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty by a jury on charges of possession of recently stolen property.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that reversible error was committed in the proceedings below, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed. '

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J.. and WIGGINTON, Associate Judge, concur.

Stewart v. State, 290 So. 2d 83, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7970 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

290 So. 2d 83 (Stewart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related