Stewart v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Stewart v. State

132 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 688

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 3, 1931

Docket3 Div. 672.

StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 925 (Stewart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. State, 132 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 688 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of burglary and appeals. The evidence for the state made out a plain case of burglary and connected this defendant with such burglary as particeps criminis. There was no error in any ruling of the court' upon the admission of testimony and those written refused charges stating correct propositions of law were fully covered by the court in its general charge.

The defendant has had a fair trial according to the forms of law; the jury has passed upon his guilt and found him guilty. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted of burglary and appeals. The evidence for the state made out a plain case of burglary and connected this defendant with such burglary as particeps criminis. There was no error in any ruling of the court' upon the admission of testimony and those written refused charges stating correct propositions of law were fully covered by the court in its general charge.

The defendant has had a fair trial according to the forms of law; the jury has passed upon his guilt and found him guilty. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-state-alactapp-1931.