Stewart v. Standard Oil Co.

173 So. 2d 458, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4449
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 1965
DocketNo. 4767
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 So. 2d 458 (Stewart v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Standard Oil Co., 173 So. 2d 458, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4449 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff George William Stewart appeals an order granting a new trial after jury verdict against the defendant, Standard Oil Company of Kentucky, and Jack Patrick Byrd.

A motion for new trial should be granted only in the exercise of the sound, considered discretion of the trial court, and when granted should not be disturbed unless there is a clear showing that such authority has been abused. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669. A careful consideration of the record before the court, and the briefs of counsel reveal no showing of abuse of discretion by the trial court.

Affirmed.

SMITH, C. J., and ANDREWS and KANNER, (RET.), JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McFall v. Florida State Board of Dental Examiners
173 So. 2d 458 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 So. 2d 458, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-standard-oil-co-fladistctapp-1965.