Stewart v. St. & Co.
This text of 10 Cal. 372 (Stewart v. St. & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terry, C. J., and Field, J., concurring.
The defendants are in no condition to avail themselves of the points made in their briefs, if, indeed, there is anything in them. In the first place, there seems to be no statement. In the second, the allegations of the complaint are not specifically denied; and, in the third place, we think that the only point seriously urged by the appellants—the want of consideration in the paper sued upon—is unfounded, because whatever the rule may be at common law, the statute (Wood’s Digest, 75, 81) makes such an instrument as that sued on, prima facie evidence of indebtedness, though no consideration be expressed therein.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Cal. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-st-co-cal-1858.