Stewart v. Soda

226 A.D.2d 1102, 642 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580

This text of 226 A.D.2d 1102 (Stewart v. Soda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Soda, 226 A.D.2d 1102, 642 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Family Court erred in terminating visitation between respondent and his children because respondent failed to pay child support. Visitation cannot be terminated solely for reasons unrelated to the welfare of the child (Vasile v Vasile, 116 AD2d 1021). The failure to pay support, "without more, is an insufficient basis upon which to deny visitation” (Resignato v Resignato, 213 AD2d 616, 617, citing Engrassia v Di Lullo, 89 AD2d 957). (Appeal from Order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.—Visitation.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Engrassia v. Di Lullo
89 A.D.2d 957 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Vasile v. Vasile
116 A.D.2d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Resignato v. Resignato
213 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 A.D.2d 1102, 642 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-soda-nyappdiv-1996.