Stewart v. Smith

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Stewart v. Smith

23 F. Cas. 72, 2 Cranch 615

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedMay 15, 1825

StatusPublished

This text of 23 F. Cas. 72 (Stewart v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Smith, 23 F. Cas. 72, 2 Cranch 615 (circtddc 1825).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT

(nem. con.) ordered the sale to be set aside, because the decree nisi, notwithstanding the clause in it stating that it should be final nisi the end of the term then next succeeding, did not become absolute until after the sale had been made. Having adopted, as general rules of practice in this court, the rules prescribed by the supreme court of the United States, this court is bound by them, and the defendants had a right to appear according to those rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT

(nem. con.) ordered the sale to be set aside, because the decree nisi, notwithstanding the clause in it stating that it should be final nisi the end of the term then next succeeding, did not become absolute until after the sale had been made. Having adopted, as general rules of practice in this court, the rules prescribed by the supreme court of the United States, this court is bound by them, and the defendants had a right to appear according to those rules.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 F. Cas. 72, 2 Cranch 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-smith-circtddc-1825.