Stewart v. Schreiner

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 18, 2025·No. 2:23-cv-00277·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

ANTHONY STEWART, Case No. 2:23-cv-00277-MMD-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), gly. ORDER JONAH LEE SCHREINER, et al., 10 Defendant(s). 11 It appears that Plaintiff has failed to update his address. Docket Nos. 72, 74, 76. “A party, 12} not the district court, bears the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing 13]| address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 14] 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the local rules require that litigants immediately file with 15] the Court written notification of any change of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so 16] may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See Local Rule IA 3-1. 17 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by 18] September 8, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 Dated: August 18, 2025 . Nancy J..Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Schreiner, (D. Nev. 2025).

Stewart v. Schreiner (Stewart v. Schreiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory Carey v. John E. King
856 F.2d 1439 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
United States v. Richard M. Penta
940 F.2d 13 (First Circuit, 1991)