Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc.
790 So. 2d 432, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10732, 2001 WL 864305
Opinion
The judge of compensation claims did not err by refusing to determine a permanent impairment rating for claimant, because that issue was not properly pleaded, nor was it tried by consent. See Lakeside Baptist Church v. Jones, 714 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Norrell Temp. Servs. v. Baxter, 645 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Allied Parcel Delivery v. Dixon, 466 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc., 790 So. 2d 432, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10732, 2001 WL 864305 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
790 So. 2d 432 (Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lakeside Baptist Church v. Jones
714 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Allied Parcel Delivery v. Dixon
466 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Norrell Temporary Services v. Baxter
645 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)