Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc.

Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc.

790 So. 2d 432, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10732, 2001 WL 864305
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 2001
DocketNo. 1D00-2917
StatusPublished

This text of 790 So. 2d 432 (Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. Scarritt Motors, Inc., 790 So. 2d 432, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10732, 2001 WL 864305 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims did not err by refusing to determine a permanent impairment rating for claimant, because that issue was not properly pleaded, nor was it tried by consent. See Lakeside Baptist Church v. Jones, 714 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Norrell Temp. Servs. v. Baxter, 645 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Allied Parcel Delivery v. Dixon, 466 So.2d 439 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, WEBSTER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lakeside Baptist Church v. Jones
714 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Allied Parcel Delivery v. Dixon
466 So. 2d 439 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Norrell Temporary Services v. Baxter
645 So. 2d 1068 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 So. 2d 432, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 10732, 2001 WL 864305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-scarritt-motors-inc-fladistctapp-2001.