Stewart v. Ragon

Eighth Circuit

Stewart v. Ragon

447 F. App'x 756

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided February 6, 2012·No. No. 11-3093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Stewart appeals from the district court’s¹ pre-service 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal, with prejudice, of his pro se action alleging employment discrimination. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), this court concludes that the dismissal of Stewart’s case was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Stewart appeals from the district court’s¹ pre-service 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal, with prejudice, of his pro se action alleging employment discrimination. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), this court concludes that the dismissal of Stewart’s case was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Stewart v. Ragon, 447 F. App'x 756 (8th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

447 F. App'x 756 (Stewart v. Ragon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related