Stewart v. Ragon

Eighth Circuit

Stewart v. Ragon

447 F. App'x 756

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 2012

DocketNo. 11-3093

StatusPublished

This text of 447 F. App'x 756 (Stewart v. Ragon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Ragon, 447 F. App'x 756 (8th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Stewart appeals from the district court’s¹ pre-service 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal, with prejudice, of his pro se action alleging employment discrimination. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), this court concludes that the dismissal of Stewart’s case was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Stewart appeals from the district court’s¹ pre-service 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) dismissal, with prejudice, of his pro se action alleging employment discrimination. Upon careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review), this court concludes that the dismissal of Stewart’s case was proper for the reasons stated by the district court.

This court affirms. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 F. App'x 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-ragon-ca8-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack