Stewart v. Raborg
This text of Stewart v. Raborg (Stewart v. Raborg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6276
LARRY L. STEWART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
W.B. RABORG, State Police/Trooper,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 03-6567
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-03-41-AM)
Submitted: September 11, 2003 Decided: September 17, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry L. Stewart, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Larry L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Stewart v. Raborg, No. CA-03-41-AM (E.D. Va.
filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 27, 2003; filed Mar. 10, 2003 &
entered Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Stewart v. Raborg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-raborg-ca4-2003.