Stewart v. Raborg

Fourth Circuit

Stewart v. Raborg

75 F. App'x 194

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2003·No. Nos. 03-6276, 03-6567·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Larry L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Raborg, No. CA-03-41-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 27, 2003; filed Mar. 10, 2003 & entered Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Larry L. Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying him leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Stewart v. Raborg, No. CA-03-41-AM (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 21, 2003 & entered Jan. 27, 2003; filed Mar. 10, 2003 & entered Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Stewart v. Raborg, 75 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

75 F. App'x 194 (Stewart v. Raborg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related