Stewart v. Pennsylvania R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Stewart v. Pennsylvania R. R.

141 A. 926, 293 Pa. 38, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 467

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 15, 1928

DocketAppeals, 76 and 77

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 141 A. 926 (Stewart v. Pennsylvania R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Pennsylvania R. R., 141 A. 926, 293 Pa. 38, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 467 (Pa. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint here is that the court below abused its discretion by not granting a new trial on what defendant, appellant, claims to be the clear weight of the *39 evidence in its favor. It is not necessary, and would serve no useful purpose, to state the facts or review the evidence. After reading the printed testimony, we are not convinced of error; the issues involved were for the jury and it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial.

The judgments are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint here is that the court below abused its discretion by not granting a new trial on what defendant, appellant, claims to be the clear weight of the *39 evidence in its favor. It is not necessary, and would serve no useful purpose, to state the facts or review the evidence. After reading the printed testimony, we are not convinced of error; the issues involved were for the jury and it does not appear that there was any abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial.

The judgments are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

141 A. 926, 293 Pa. 38, 1928 Pa. LEXIS 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-pennsylvania-r-r-pa-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack