Stewart v. Pecsi

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 3, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-01744·Unknown

Opinion

||PORTER SCOTT Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 Matthew W. Gross, SBN 324007 350 University Ave., Suite 200 4 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 5 || FAX: 916.927.3706 6 || Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF YUBA and TAMARA PECSI 9 JAMES STEWART, Individually and as No. 2:19-cv-01744 TLN-DB 10 || Successor in Interest to Decedent JAHMAL ll DERRICK STEWART, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER 12 Plaintiff, Complaint Filed: 09/03/2019 13 Vv. 14 COUNTY OF YUBA, a municipal 15 || corporation, TAMARA PECSI, individually and in her official capacity as a deputy 16 |! sheriff for the Yuba County Sheriff’s 17 Department; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, individually and in their official capacity as 18 || agents for Yuba County Sheriff's Department, 19 20 Defendants.

21 23 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary, or private information for which protection from public disclosure and from use for any 25 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate 26 to, and request the court to enter, the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that 27 || this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 28 protection it affords extends only to the limited extent such information or items are entitled to confidential {02165024.DOCX} STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER

1 treatment under the applicable federal law, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability 2 Act (“HIPAA”) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties further acknowledge that this 3 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal. Civil Local 4 Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 5 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 7 The parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 8 1. DOCUMENTS. The following documents are protected Materials and shall not be used 9 for any purpose other than this litigation: 10 (a) any incident report and related investigation concerning the allegations in the 11 Complaint made by the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department; 12 (b) coroner records or other medical records; 13 (c) personnel files of any peace officer or medical personnel involved in this case; 14 (d) if a party wants to designate a document other than what is identified above as 15 confidential under this Protective Order, the procedure set forth in Sections D and E shall be followed. 16 2. SCOPE 17 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material, but 18 also: (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, 19 or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties 20 or their Counsel of Record that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by 21 this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public 22 domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its 23 disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including 24 becoming part of the public record through court order, trial, or otherwise; and (b) any information known 25 to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from 26 a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the 27 Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or 28 order. 1 3. DURATION 2 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order 3 shall remain in effect until: (1) a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing; (2) a court order otherwise 4 directs; or (3) there is a complete return or destruction of all Protected Material pursuant to Section 8. 5 Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of: (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, 6 with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, 7 rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing any motions or 8 applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 9 4. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 10 4.1 Basic Principles 11 A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or 12 by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this 13 litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 14 conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must 15 comply with the provisions of section 8 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored 16 and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited 17 to the persons authorized under this Order. 18 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items 19 Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving 20 Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 21 (a) the Receiving Party’s Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said 22 Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; 23 (b) the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is 24 reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be 25 Bound” (Exhibit A); 26 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably 27 necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 28 (Exhibit A); 1 (d) the court and its personnel; 2 (e) court reporters and their staff, professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional 3 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 4 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 5 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary 6 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise 7 agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or 8 exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and 9 may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order. 10 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other 11 person who otherwise possessed or knew the information. 12 5. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED IN OTHER LITIGATION 13 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels 14 disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” that Party must: 15 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a 16 copy of the subpoena or court order; 17 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in 18 the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this 19 Protective Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Pecsi, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Stewart v. Pecsi (Stewart v. Pecsi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)