Stewart v. Pearson

Tenth Circuit

Stewart v. Pearson

309 F. App'x 216

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 2009

DocketNo. 08-8060

StatusPublished

This text of 309 F. App'x 216 (Stewart v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Stewart v. Pearson, 309 F. App'x 216 (10th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Appellees’ Status Report and Suggestion of Mootness,” and the responses filed by the appellant Trustee and amicus United States, the court orders this appeal DISMISSED as moot.

It is further ordered that the opinion of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (BAP), issued on July 28, 2008, 390 B.R. 706, is VACATED. The matter is remanded to the BAP with instructions to vacate the bankruptcy court’s ruling as to the vehicle-ownership-deduction issue and dismiss the BAP appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon consideration of the “Appellees’ Status Report and Suggestion of Mootness,” and the responses filed by the appellant Trustee and amicus United States, the court orders this appeal DISMISSED as moot.

It is further ordered that the opinion of the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit (BAP), issued on July 28, 2008, 390 B.R. 706, is VACATED. The matter is remanded to the BAP with instructions to vacate the bankruptcy court’s ruling as to the vehicle-ownership-deduction issue and dismiss the BAP appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 F. App'x 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-pearson-ca10-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack