Stewart v. Mississippi State Highway Commission

186 So. 633, 185 Miss. 328, 1939 Miss. LEXIS 115
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided February 13, 1939·No. No. 33662.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

— Appellants’ motion to strike the certificates and affidavits from the record, that were not introduced in evidence on the trial court below, is sustained, but is overruled so far as their use in this court is concerned on appellee’s motion for an additional supersedeas bond.

Appellee’s motion that appellants be required to give an additional supersedeas bond is sustained, and the penalty of such bond is hereby fixed at the sum of $50,000, payable and conditioned according to law, the surety to be some surety company authorized to do business in this state, such bond to be given and approved by the clerk of this court within ten days from the date of this order, and, if not given and approved within that time, the supersedeas is hereby discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stewart v. Mississippi State Highway Commission, 186 So. 633, 185 Miss. 328, 1939 Miss. LEXIS 115 (Mich. 1939).

186 So. 633 (Stewart v. Mississippi State Highway Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perkins v. Thompson
539 So. 2d 1029 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1989)
In Re Estate of Taylor
539 So. 2d 1029 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1989)
Copeland v. Robertson
112 So. 2d 236 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1959)
Horton v. Boatright
105 So. 2d 567 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1958)