Stewart v. McIntyre

57 A.D.2d 831, 394 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12033
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 831 (Stewart v. McIntyre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stewart v. McIntyre, 57 A.D.2d 831, 394 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12033 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant William B. McIntyre appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 1, 1976, which, after a hearing, denied his motion to dismiss the action as against him for lack of personal jurisdiction. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and action remanded to Special Term for a further hearing in accordance herewith. The plaintiff attempted to effect service upon appellant pursuant to the provisions of section 253 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. The Secretary of State was duly served pursuant thereto. However, a summons and verified complaint sent to appellant by registered mail, return receipt requested, at the address appearing on the police accident report, were returned marked "unclaimed”. To effect service pursu[832]*832ant to section 253 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, the return receipt must be either returned, signed by the defendant or a qualified person, or there must be proof of a refusal to accept the attempted delivery. The notation "unclaimed” indicates that no notice was received by the defendant (see Grandison v College Truck Renting Corp., 26 AD2d 260, 262). There was insufficient evidence elicited at the hearing to determine whether the appellant was responsible for intentionally or negligently giving an erroneous address, and is thereby estopped from claiming defective service (see Greenwood v White, 25 AD2d 73, 75). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dalrymple v. JBJ Auto Trading, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 05089 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Indymac Bank, FSB v. MacPherson
303 A.D.2d 558 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Bank of New York v. MacPherson
301 A.D.2d 485 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Squire v. Greenberg
173 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
La Vallee v. Peer
104 Misc. 2d 943 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)
Free Cab Corp. v. Fort
94 Misc. 2d 351 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.2d 831, 394 N.Y.S.2d 58, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stewart-v-mcintyre-nyappdiv-1977.